Christianity: For Whites Only

jesus-sacred-heart-statue-small.jpg (650×526) | HEARTS ...

Since the end of WWII the onslaught against White Christian nations has accelerated and is aimed not only at the physical existence and wellbeing, but also the very soul of our people. Within our midst we have politicians, theologians and teachers who are following an alien political agenda, who are feeding Christians, especially their vulnerable children, with views contrary to nature and the Holy Scriptures. This is a form of ‘social engineering’ which follows the communist doctrine where everybody is regarded as ‘equal’ in ability. This ‘equality’ is to be achieved by dumbing down the gifted and artificially raising the less gifted, especially in countries where there is forced racial mixing. This social engineering takes on an explicit and intentional racial agenda. Families and nations are to be done away with, and there will be a One World government and religion – which will not be Christianity. These satanic termites want to do away with race and national governments, thus promoting miscegenation where ultimately humanity becomes one malleable, androgynous, amorphous brown race – all under the control of the Serpent Seed Jews.

The focus of this article is to deal with the doctrine proclaimed from many pulpits that Christ was a jew, arab, or negro man. By implication, King David, Adam and even God would then be ‘Colored’ – for are we not ‘all’ made in His image? ‘Time ‘ magazine (Dec 22, 2003 and April 12 , 2004) had an artist’s recreation of the face of Christ where he was portrayed as a podgy, brown man with curly brown hair, with a weak face. Had this been a depiction of Mohammed, the world would have gone up in flames as Muslims would have shown their disgust and anger.

What many people fail to understand is that people who inhabit a country and call themselves by an historical name need not be the people who lived there hundreds or even thousands of years ago. The demography may have changed so much that they are unrecognizable when compared with the original inhabitants. Where did the name ‘German’ originate? It is perpetuated in the English language but is not what this people originally called themselves , and are known mostly by their tribal names in other languages. The land originally inhabited by the Scythians was later occupied by another people when they moved into what is today Deutschland and to distinguish between the two, the Romans called them the Germania Scythia – the genuine Scythians – and later the term Scythia was dropped and ‘Germania’ retained. The Romans brought this terminology to Britain. The Greeks of today do not resemble the tall, fair-haired Greeks of antiquity; neither do the Italians of today look like the legionaries of Rome, who were initially required to be at least 6 foot tall. As other races became assimilated into the Roman Empire, this requirement had to be lowered in order to recruit sufficient soldiers. The sea-faring Portuguese from the 16th century with a population then of only about 1 million inhabitants made the fatal mistake of allowing hordes of Black slaves into their homeland and as their blood became severely diluted they disappeared as a pioneering force from the world stage.

Who was Adam?

The Bible is the history and genealogy of those descended from Adam. It is not concerned with the other ‘races’ except where they pertain to the story of the descendants of Adam. Adam was not the first human-like being on Earth. This is evident in the Bible where Cain is driven out of the land by God and says “I shall be a fugitive and a vagabond in the earth; and it shall come to pass, that everyone that findeth me shall slay me” (Gen. 4:14). This was said when ‘Churchianity’ would have you believe that there were only four people on earth – Adam, Eve, Cain and Abel. God’s response to Cain confirms that there were others not descended from Adam around: ”And the Lord said unto him, therefore whosoever slayeth Cain, vengeance shall be taken on him sevenfold. And the Lord set a mark upon Cain, lest any finding him should kill him” (Gen. 4:15). Why put a mark on Cain if only his mother and father were then in existence ? Cain and his wife then go on to build a city (Gen. 4:17) – thus the age-old question, “where did his wife come from?” (That’s a subject for another time).

If the underlying premise (that Adam is the progenitor of every person on earth past and present) is incorrect – and drastically so – then everything that follows will be incorrect. If yet further incorrect premises are added to the first premise (such as the Jews of today are the Israelites of yesteryear), then we are dealing with complete fabrications and distortions with severe implications for the descendants of Adam in an age where race-mixing is being forced upon the White Christian nations only.

In Hebrew Adam consists of two words as ‘Aw­ dawm’ which means ‘blood in the face, i.e. someone who is able to blush’. There is only one racial group that is able to blush – the White race. So how can Adam be the first man in the world, be white, yet give rise to all the dark nations as well? He did not. The Bible is a history only of the Adamites – those who were White. If Adam was a White man, then his progeny would be White unless it was recorded that they had taken wives who were not white (as in the case of Esau).

Also, “When the Most High divided to the nations their inheritance, when he separated the sons of Adam, he set the bounds of the people according to the number of the children of Israel” (Deut.32:8). The sons of Adam refer to only the children of Israel.

The physical appearance of Jesus

Extracts of a letter from Pontius Pilate to Tiberius Caesar (copies in the Congressional Library in Washington) :

“…. . One day I observed in the midst of a group of people a young man who was leaning against a tree, calmly addressing the multitude. I was told it was Jesus. This I could easily have suspected so great was the difference between him and those listening to him. His golden coloured hair and beard gave to his appearance a celestial aspect. He appeared to be about 30 years of age. Never have I seen a sweeter or more serene countenance. What a contrast between him and his hearers with their black beards and tawny complexions! …. Later, I wrote to Jesus requesting an interview with him at the Praetorium. …. For some time I stood admiring this extraordinary man. There was nothing in him that was repelling , nor in his character, yet did I feel awed in his presence. I told him that there was a magnetic simplicity about him and his personality that elevated him far above the philosophers and teachers of his day. …. “.

A description of Jesus by Publius Lentrelus a resident of Judea in the reign of Tiberius Caesar which first appeared in the writings of St Anselm of Canterbury in the 11th century:

“There lives at this time in Judea a man of singular virtue whose name is Jesus Christ, whom the barbarians esteem as a prophet, but his followers love and adore as the offspring of the immortal God … He is a tall man, well-shaped, and of an amiable and revered aspect; his hair of a colour that can hardly be matched, falling into graceful curls, waving about and very agreeable crouching upon his shoulders, parted on the crown of the head, running as a stream to the front after the fashion of the Nazarites. His forehead high, large and imposing; his cheeks without spot or wrinkle, beautiful with a lovely red; his nose and mouth formed with exquisite symmetry; his beard, and of a colour suitable to his hair, reaching below his chin and parted in the middle like a fork; his eyes bright blue, clear and serene. Look innocent, dignified, manly and mature. In proportion of body most perfect, and captivating; his arms and hands delectable to behold. ….. A man for his extraordinary beauty and perfection, surpassing the children of men in every sense”.

A further description of Jesus is found in The Archko Volume which contains official court documents from the days of the Messiah. This information substantiates that He came from racial lines.’. which had blue eyes and golden hair. In a chapter titled “Gamaliel’s Interview” it states concerning Jesus: “I asked him to describe his person to me, so that I might know him if I should meet him. While he is nothing but a man, there is something about him that distinguishes him from every other man. He is the picture of his mother, only he has not her smooth, round face. His hair is a little more golden than hers, though it is as much from sunburn than anything else . He is tall, and his shoulders are a little drooped; his visage is thin and of a swarthy complexion, though this is from exposure. His eyes are large and a soft blue, and rather dull and heavy”.

Mary was from a priestly bloodline with direct descent from Aaron (the Egyptian high priest) who was the brother of Moses, while Elizabeth, wife of Zacharias was the cousin of Mary and the mother of John the Baptist and thus also descended of Aaron (Luke 1: 5, 36). Moses must have closely resembled the ruling class of Egypt to have been accepted as family after been found in the basket in the bulrushes.

The Old Testament book The Song of Solomon (5:10) appears to confirm the above descriptions of Jesus. Many theologians are convinced that the ‘husband’ in this book has a dual fulfillment in both Solomon and, prophetically, in Jesus the Messiah: “My beloved {husband} is white and ruddy . . . .”

The wise men who visited the stable soon after the birth of Jesus after following the prophesied signs in the heavens, confirmed that the child was ‘without blemish and without spot’ (1 Peter 1:19) and was indeed the Christ (blemish = physical defect or disfigurement e.g. scar or stain). Christ had to be purebred to be the son of God i.e. not of mixed blood. Theologians today like to interpret this as ‘without a moral defect’ but this would be impossible for the wise men to determine at birth .

The physical description of David

”And he sent, and brought him in. Now he was ruddy [admoni], and withal of a beautiful countenance, and goodly to look to” (1 Sam. 16:12) .

”And when the Philistine [Goliath] looked about, and saw David, he disdained him: for he was but a youth, and ruddy, and of a fair countenance (1 Sam. 17:42). David’s daughter Tamar was ‘fair’ (2 Sam. 13:1). Sarah and Rebekah who were both descended from Adam were both described as being ‘very fair’ (Gen. 12:11 , 14; 24:16; 26:7). Moses was ‘exceedingly fair ‘ (Acts 7:20). The daughters of Job, one of the Adamic patriarchs, were known as the ‘ fairest women in all the land’ (Job 42:15). Solomon was described as being ‘white and ruddy’ (Solomon 5:10). The Nazarites (consecrated persons) of Judah were ‘whiter than milk’ and ‘more ruddy in body than rubies’ (Lam. 4:7).

[N.B. Chambers Concise Dictionary, 1988, p 932. Ruddy: red; reddish; of the color of healthy skin in white peoples].

Jesus was a descendant of David.

Ancient writers such as Polemon of Ilium, Galienos, Clement of Alexandria, and Adamantios state that the Scythians were like the Celts and Germans, and describe them as ruddy-fair. Ammianus (c350 A.D.) describes them as almost all tall and handsome, with hair almost yellow, and a fierce look. This is how the Bible describes the Israelites.

The physical appearance of Abraham and Sarah’s descendants:

Abraham migrated from the city of Ur in Sumer to the Promised Land. The Sumerians were Aryans and so were Abraham and his family. ‘Pur’ is the Sanskrit word for city from which the Greek word ‘Polis’ is derived. Ur from which Abraham and his family migrated was an Aryan city in Sumer.

The name Laban itself means to be white. He was Abraham’s grand-nephew, father of Jacob’s wives Leah and Rachel. Jacob’s father Isaac got his wife Rebekah from Laban’s father, Bethuel.

The Bible clearly describes Abraham and Sarah’s descendants as ‘fair’ (Heb. yaheh . Gen. 12:11 ; 24:16; 26:7; Esther 2:7) .

The description of Sarah in the seventh Dead Sea Scroll extolled Sarah’s perfection:

“Her skin was pure white; She had long and lovely hair; her limbs were smooth and rounded (her thighs were shapely); She had slender legs and small feet; her hands were slim and long and so were her fingers”. Abraham, being a relative of Sarah (Gen. 20:12) would be identical in appearance.

The physical description of Israel’s Nazarites:

The Nazarites are described as being ‘purer than snow, they were whiter than milk, they were more ruddy in body than rubies (Lam. 4:7).

So, the point is: You are constantly being deceived by the enemies of God, and the enemies of the White race. They want to erase and re-write history in order to rob you of your heritage.

Regardless of the false claims of “jewdeo-churchianity”, these things are certain: The Bible is a book to, from, for, by, and about the White race EXCLUSIVELY. Adam was a white man. Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob were white. The tribes of Israel were white. The Kings of Israel, including David and Solomon were white. Jesus Christ was white.

Do you understand why the kikes and the mud-people go to such extreme lengths to marginalize and vilify white people?

Christian Universalism is a lie. Racial Covenant Theology is the only, true, and Scriptural basis of salvation. The New Covenant is simply a renewing of the Old Covenant, WHICH WAS FOR THE WHITE RACIAL DESCENDANTS OF ABRAHAM ONLY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

“……..the people SHALL DWELL ALONE, and shall NOT BE reckoned among the nations.“ – Numbers 23:9

“……..shall be a SPECIAL treasure unto me ABOVE ALL people: for all the earth is mine: And ye shall be unto me a kingdom of priests, and an holy nation.” – Exodus 19:5, 6

“…….. and the Lord hath CHOSEN thee to be a PECULIAR/SPECIAL people unto himself, ABOVE ALL the nations that are upon the earth.“ – Deuteronomy 14:2

“…….. l am the Lord your God, which have separated you from other people. And ye shall be holy unto me: for l the Lord am holy, and have severed you from other people, that YE should be MINE.” – Leviticus 20:24, 26

“……..You ONLY have I known of ALL the families of the earth.” – Amos 3:2

“……..I am NOT sent BUT unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.“ – Matthew 15:24 (ONLY)

“……..Blessed be the Lord God of Israel; for he hath visited and redeemed HIS people.“ – Luke 1:68

Yet despite this, people reject the Chosen Servant People theme of the Bible – either outright or by substituting Jews or ‘spiritualizing’ it to include everyone. Do they realize what they are saying? That God made promises He couldn’t keep? He changed His mind? That because Israel sinned He dropped the idea, despite His unconditional promise that they would be a nation before Him as long as the sun, moon and stars endure? (Jer. 31:36) These are the ones that in the same chapter He says He loves “… with an everlasting love.”

The logical and inevitable conclusion one would have to reach from such conclusions is that God is not omnipotent. He is not omniscient. He is not omnipresent. He is not a God of truth. But what Christian would openly say any of these things? None! But they are saying it nevertheless if they deny continuing Israel. “By myself have I sworn,” said the Almighty when He made the everlasting covenants to the patriarchs.

It seems that it was Augustine, in his City of God, who first gave out the teaching that the national covenants to Israel were transferred to the church, which would have pleased the Catholics. But it should not have been taken up by the Protestants, in their Reformation challenge. It certainly provided fuel for the free-thinkers to draw the conclusion that God was not a God of truth, or honor either, to transfer the covenants to another, the church. Catholics and Protestants of yesteryear apparently knew that the Jews were NOT the Israel of the Bible. The Jews of today know that they are NOT Israel, as their chief spokesmen have affirmed. Historically this should not be a problem, for the origins of modern Jewry are largely known and accepted in certain circles. The problem lies with Christian ministers, writers and Bible teachers who reject the authority of the Old Testament, or give it a limited acceptance, and start with the New Testament. But this cannot be understood without the Old Testament. The Gospels, with the story of Israel’s KINSMAN Redeemer, the Epistles written to Israelite communities, and the Revelation ALL tell the story of Israel – the whole twelve-tribed nation, visited, redeemed and to be completely restored. In rejecting the Old Testament, these so-called scholars are thus rejecting the New!

To get themselves out of this predicament they have to, in fact, give up, and find a new Israel. They do this by resorting to a few theological somersaults and thereby create a spiritual Israel to receive these promises. In doing so they create even more problems. Is the church a nation? Does it have a throne as David had? Does it proclaim God’s Law? Here’s the problem for they reject the Law, substituting grace and freedom from any legal restraint.

Christendom has been sadly let down by its champions. They affirm the Jews are all Israel, which they most certainly are NOT. Or that the church is Israel and this involves the rejection of all God’s covenants, and therefore the God of the Covenants.

This explains the enmity – the hatred for us Whites by the others. Whether you think God created the other races; or believe they are animal/human/demon hybrids. One thing is for sure. God has a covenant with White People ONLY. The rest are excluded. In their spirits they know this, and like carnivores stalking their prey, these ‘others’ instinctively live for our destruction. If they can’t have God, then they don’t want us to have Him either. If it were just ‘us’ against ‘them’, it would be no contest, but unfortunately, it is the traitors of our own race who stand in church pulpits and betray God and His people by spewing the very lies that were given to them by Satan to deceive God’s elect.

I shudder to think what will become of them when the God of the White Race comes to set things straight.