There is more than enough proof that we never put a man on the moon. Sadly, many very intelligent people choose to believe a lie over the truth. This article is not for them.
This is for open-minded people who are skeptical of their government. This is for thinkers – not kool-aid drinkers.
Award-winning journalist and film-maker, Bart Sibrel wrote this article. His information is below; including links to two of his films.
If you are undecided about the Moon Landing Hoax, prepare to have your mind blown!
Bart Sibrel thesleuthjournal.com – click for website
Ever wonder why they claimed to have walked on the moon, on the very first attempt (even though, right here on earth, Mt. Everest and the South Pole took numerous tries before success), allegedly accomplishing this amazing feat with antiquated 1960’s technology (while today a cell phone has one million times more computing power than all of NASA did back then), yet today, fifty years later, the farthest an astronaut can travel from the Earth is only 1/1000th the distance as claimed half a century ago on the very first try, despite there being five decades more advancements in rockets and computers?
The simple fact is, half of all crimes are “conspiracies”. Half are done without forethought, in the heat of the emotion of the moment, and half are plotted out in advance, thus making them conspiracies. Those who would like the public to ignore half of all the crimes in the world by ridiculing those with an intellect to perceive such forethought frauds are simply those perpetrating the deceptions in the first place.
We have to understand that if a tiny spider, the size of a dime, can meticulously plan and trap its prey weeks in advance, then the human mind, if inclined to evil, can do so much more evil, so much farther in advance. Additionally, a lie, or conspiracy, is the only crime that can exist without tangible evidence. If someone is murdered, there is a dead body. If someone steals, there is the material possession lacking in one place and existing in another. Yet, when someone lies, where is it? A lie is the only crime that you cannot touch, that you cannot see. A lie is purely ethereal. This is why lies are the favorite misdeeds of habitual criminals. After all, out of all of the crimes committed in the world for which people are put in prison, how many of them are there for simply lying?
The origin of crime is the lie, or conspiracy, invented in advance of the iniquity, to cover up the wrongdoing before it is even committed. When crimes are committed on a national and international scale, then national and international lies, or conspiracies, are needed. This is why criminal multibillion-dollar corporations and governments have consolidated all television networks, magazines, and newspapers. It is to control your perception of reality, not to offer you reality. As someone who worked as senior editor in television news for two years, I can testify to this fact. We referred to our broadcast as a “show”, not “news”, simply because it was completely controlled from the top down like any corporation, where the “anchors” (readers) simply regurgitated the scripted words from unseen superiors.
Highly respected and Pulitzer Prize winning “Watergate” reporter Carl Bernstein had this to say about exactly who it is who has central control over the media (intelligence) . . . The “Central Intelligence Agency” (CIA) of course . . . the very ones who staged the “moon missions” through their favorite manipulative tool . . . Television . . .
“More than 400 American ‘journalists’ (that we know of) have secretly carried out assignments for the Central Intelligence Agency, according to documents on file at CIA headquarters. In many instances, CIA documents show that ‘journalists’ were contracted to perform covert missions for the CIA with the consent of the managers of America’s leading news organizations. Among the executives (that we know of) who lent their cooperation to the CIA, were the heads of Time Magazine, Newsweek, the New York Times, ABC, NBC, CBS, the Associate Press, United Press International, and Reuters.”
(CNN, FOX, MSNBC, and USA Today are not on the list simply because they did not exist at the time of his quote.)
If a President says that their loathing of dishonest information is against the “Media” and not the CIA, they fail to recognize, or at least acknowledge for reasons of personal safety, that they are one and the same thing. The media is controlled by the CIA (as you just read above), whose native language, as spies, is lies. The perhaps once honorable agency, like many others, first initiated to protect American citizens from foreign adversaries, has been turned against them, like a rabid dog on their owner, spending taxpayer’s hard earned money to lie to them without their consent, breaking federal law, which forbids domestic propaganda, as well as lying though the medium of television, of which the “moon landings” were the climax thereof.
If a President is serious about “Ethics Reform”, then what better Rallying Cry of the Ages than to inform the citizenry that the corrupt and out of control “Federal Government” took their hard earned money (about $1000 per person in today’s dollars) to lie to them about the “moon landings” without their consent. Once every American knows of this outrageous Federal Government fraud, any President will have an Ethics Reform Mandate unlike any in all of American history. If the Truth about the “moon landings” is swept under the rug again and again, like countless Presidential cowards have done before, then America’s honorable reputation will be forever sealed with permanent criminality and corruption.
In order to improve America, you have to first tear down decaying infrastructure, methodology, and corruption. This convenient lie of the Nixon administration must be humbly acknowledged by the leaders of America in order for our country to start fresh, otherwise we are just painting over mold that will infest our future. To confess sin is Nobel. It is the very reason why President Kennedy had unprecedentedly high approval ratings, because he acknowledged his and his country’s mistakes.
If indeed the “moon landings” during the notoriously unscrupulous Nixon administration were part of a television deception, then you better believe that the CIA played a central role in the endeavor, which was entirely presented by the above media outlets, already proven to be under the CIA’s direct control. Furthermore, unlike any other occasion in recorded history, there was absolutely no independent press coverage of such a monumental event. 100% of the television pictures and photographs presented to the public were entirely controlled by the Federal Government, who was assumed to be honest.
When I was a child, believing in Santa clause was so much fun. Believing that we live in a magical world where men can fly to the moon on their very first attempt with 1960’s technology is fun too, even though the feat cannot be repeated fifty years later, by any nation on earth, including the one that allegedly did it first half a century ago, even though all Truth reminds us that the South Pole, and Mt. Everest, and First Flight, and the Light Bulb, was never, ever achieved on the first attempt, and certainly never abandoned once achieved, never to be repeated again. The fact is, when you find out the Truth about Santa Clause, you are glad to know it, even if it hurts a little, realizing that a painful Truth is still better than a sweet lie. All of academia and aerospace needs to know the painful Truth. They will be thankful for it and it will save the future lives of those who wrongfully believe in space travel’s falsified ease.
The fact is, if it were so easy to go to the moon with 1960’s technology fifty years ago, on the very first attempt, then there would be manned bases there by now and there would have been a man on Mars twenty-five years ago. The fact that there are still not moon bases to this day, with half a century more advancements in rocketry and computers, is proof itself that traveling to the moon still cannot be done, today, much less in the 1960’s with 1/millionth the computing power in all of NASA than is found in a modern day cell phone. Claiming that they went 1000 times farther, with five decades older technology, than the farthest astronaut can travel today, with half a century more advancements in rockets and computers, on the very first attempt, simply defies logic.
Why do so many smart people believe this lie? Because they want to. They want to believe this lie. Believing this lie means that they live in a better world than they actually do. Yet the fact is, they do not. The number one reason I hear from intelligent, yet disbelieving critics of the moon landing fraud, is that, “No one would ever do such a dishonest thing as lying about such an important accomplishment”. Really? They forget that they live in a world full of unthinkable child molestation, vicious murder, hateful racism, deplorable rape, and horrific million-man genocide. In a world such as this, what is all of this in minor comparison to merely cheating in a contest, as so many people have done before? In these peoples’ longing to be part of a society of pride boosting miraculous science, misguided self-proclaimed “intellectuals” fail to see the plainness of this simple fact:
Technology does not go backwards.
The South Pole has temperatures that reach below 100 degrees Fahrenheit (-73 C) and nearly continual hurricane force winds, yet there are bases there today. Why? Because it is humanly possible. If it were humanly possible to reach the moon, fifty years ago or today, there too would be bases there right now. The fact that there are not, with half a century more advancements in rockets and computers, is proof itself that it simply cannot be done, not even today, and especially not with fifty years older technology. The problem is, you have to be willing to give up this deep emotional imprinting, in pursuit of Honor and Truth, in order to see the plainness of this harsh and startling reality.
After Columbus arrived in the “New World”, within two years, numerous other European nations traveled to the Americas. After Lewis and Clark ventured to the American west, shortly thereafter, citizens everywhere traveled to the American west. After the Wright brothers accomplished powered flight, within two years, numerous others repeated their technological accomplishment.
Charles Lindbergh first flew across the Atlantic in an airplane in 1927. Fifty years later, there were millions of airplanes flying across the Atlantic. In comparison, the 747 aircraft, built after seventy years of successful aviation history and millions of manufactured aircraft, which was developed with a decade newer technology than that of the “moon” spacecraft (the first ever vehicle to allegedly take men to another world), yet the 747 took one year longer to construct than the “moon landing” equipment did to merely fly seven miles above the earth and endured over 160 failed engine attempts before it finally got off of the ground!
When it comes to perceiving the Truth in a world full of lies, historically, the majority has always been deceived, and later proved wrong, by the minority of their contemporaries, whom they persecuted and considered deluded at the time, when in fact, it was the majority who were misled.
Does a person know it when they are deceived?
No, they do not.
You see, you can be sincere . . .
And be sincerely wrong.
Why is it so difficult for them to see the Truth?
Very simple . . .
Pride is simply the un-willingness to be wrong, just as humility is the willingness to be wrong. The great thing about being wrong, which is what I had to finally admit about the “moon landings”, is that I am learning something new, and I am no longer walking through life in error. The bad thing about being right all the time, is that I cannot learn anything new, and I am living my life in a self-deceived state, which is the very worst form of deception.
When someone else deceives me, if I try hard enough, I can eventually figure it out, after all, I know that other people cannot be trusted all of the time. Yet when I am self-deceived, it is nearly impossible for me to overcome this, because the person I am relying on for “facts” is myself . . . and of course I can trust myself . . . even when I am wrong.
When someone considers themself smart, this is the first step towards their ignorance. They boast about their years of experience and degrees, and thereby pour concrete around their finite knowledge, unknowingly calling their stone mound of limited facts, the entire universe of Truth. If you try to tell them they are wrong, they will defend their post to their emotional and intellectual death at all cost, all the while attempting to defile you with their venomous words for pointing out their error, even though you are right and merely trying to help them.
Just like OJ Simpson’s lawyers (who later admitted they knew of his guilt and were only “doing their job”), no matter how plain the evidence, their pride-filled manipulative lawyer-like minds have an explanation for why the Truth is a lie, and why lies are the truth, otherwise they would be forced to admit their error, which their pride will not allow, and which blinds them from perceiving the unwanted reality. With every evidence submitted to them as to why the moon landings were indeed falsified, no matter how condemning and obvious, there is always a zealous counter-explanation from them to throw away the Truth and institute a lie in its place, in order for them to keep their dying status quo fantasy alive.
Just because someone has an explanation for every piece of condemning evidence,
(like OJ Simpson’s lawyers and “moon landing” defenders)
does not mean that the explanations are True.
Rather than looking for the Truth (at the unacceptable cost of being wrong), the majority of people (because of their blinding pride in the accomplishments of themselves and like-minded others), instead “Gather around them a great number of teachers to tell them what their itching ears want to hear”. (2nd Timothy 4:3) In other words, rather than looking for the Truth, they look for people to agree with what they already believe, so as to prove themselves right.
The real question is, if you had cancer, would you want to know? . . . Or would you rather have your doctor lie to you and tell you that everything was just fine . . . even though it really was not? Sometimes you have to cut off a diseased limb to save your life. The same is True of the “moon landings”. A costly admission, yet a saving one as well.
If the “moon missions” were real, then they hold a place of prominence in the annals of human history. If they were not real, and One Hundred Fifty Billion Dollars (in today’s value) was embezzled from the taxpayers to lie to the very ones who funded the missions, then this would actually be a more significant moment in history than if they had actually gone!
Thusly, this Great Truth, the faking of the moon missions out of pride, arrogance, and greed, is being withheld by the minority of government leaders against the vast majority of citizens.
Because they think they are better than the rest of us.
Until the Truth comes out about the “moon landings”, humanity’s character, and especially that of America, will be forever stunted from growth and advancement, the very aid of which would come by simply admitting this very mistake with its deplorable dishonesty. Unless we are willing to face and confess the cold hard facts of our errors, much like a disciplined athlete rejecting appealing yet detrimental desserts, we will be under the spell, and complete control of, this diabolical hidden minority of government leaders who represent themselves rather than the people.
The falsified “moon landings” are utter proof that this is the state in which America lives today, the very admission of which would lead to these unscrupulous leaders’ demise. This is why there are more than a hundred websites and films in existence today, specifically dedicated to squashing the emerging Truth of the “moon landings” blatant and deplorable falsification. The fact is, if the moon landings are so “obviously” real, then anyone who says otherwise is an idiot. Why then are there more than a hundred websites and videos, which took tens of thousands of hours to produce, specifically designed to refute the insane rantings of morons? As Shakespeare so famously said, “Thou does protest too much.” Another historical commentator said this . . .
“The likelihood of one individual being right, increases in direct proportion to the intensity with which others are trying to prove him wrong.”
Even former president Clinton, once holding the (allegedly) highest office in the land, doubts the authenticity of the moon landings. On Page 156 of his autobiography “My Life” he states:
“Just a month before, Apollo 11 astronauts Buzz Aldrin and Neil Armstrong had left their colleague, Michael Collins, aboard spaceship Columbia and ‘walked on the moon’, beating by five months President Kennedy’s goal of putting a man on the moon before the decade was out. The old carpenter asked me if I really believed it happened. I said sure, I saw it on ‘television’. He disagreed; he said that he didn’t believe it for a minute, that ‘them television fellers’ could make things look real that weren’t. Back then, I thought he was a crank. During my eight years in Washington, I saw some things on TV that made me wonder if he wasn’t ahead of his time.”
If a president of the United States is finally admitting his doubts as to the authenticity of the “moon landings” (albeit, after he safely left office) and is calling those who perceive the Truth of the event “ahead of their time”, shouldn’t you also reconsider your thinking on the matter, if you haven’t already?
A year or two after I produced “A Funny Thing happened on the way to the Moon”, I suppose influenced by courtroom television programs wherein witnesses take an oath on the Bible as to telling the Truth, I came up with the idea to track down as many “Apollo” astronauts as I could and simply ask them if they would swear on the Bible as to the authenticity of their “moon missions”. It was during the production of this follow-up documentary that my infamous encounter with Edwin “Buzz” Aldrin occurred, in which he punched me after I called him “A Liar, a Coward, and a Thief”.
I certainly did not wake up that morning intending to say those strong words to Aldrin, neither did he plan earlier that day to sock me in the face. It was just one of those unplanned moments that got heated up and Aldrin, in my opinion, overreacted. Even if he did walk on the moon, as some would like to believe, it would be hard to call him an “American hero” when he will not defend the constitutional right of free speech, instead physically attacking those who utter words of criticism against him, like so many arrogant communist dictators have done in the past. A great thing about America is that presidential candidates can openly call each other “Liars” when debating the facts, yet they do not punch each other in the face for doing so. If they did, I doubt if they would win any elections or be idolized for very long . . . so why is Aldrin? . . . Let me tell you why . . .
I have received so many emails with the similar words, “I am not a violent person, yet I loved seeing you get punched, and I hope it happens again.” That is like saying, “I am faithful to my spouse, yet I regularly lust after others.” These are violent people in self-denial of their love for violence. When someone reacts with violence, or salivates at the sight of it, simply because I say that the “moon landings” are fraudulent, then like a radical religious sect which kills people for criticizing their prophet, this is irrefutable proof that this “moon landing” event has become a god to them (and a false one at that) whose “prophet” I have insulted. When it comes to false religion, just as it is with the false moon landings, it is this very fanaticism that prevents people from seeing the Truth about their overadored apostatized idol.
The more fanatical people become because I point out that their “moon landing” gods are frauds, the more this very fanatical behavior demonstrates their error on this subject to begin with. I have received uncounted death threats, just for saying that to people that their government lied to them on at least one occasion. I even received a death threat with the words, “I wish I could watch you, your wife, and your children, burn alive before my eyes!” Has anyone on the “Truther” side of this argument ever threatened the slightest violence against those who believe that the moon landings are real? I can firmly answer “no, not ever”. This radical defense of something that is supposed to be so “obvious” is proof itself that what is being defended is a lie.
While I do believe the things I said about Aldrin are True, I now feel that it was inappropriate to rebuke an older man so harshly. (See 1st Timothy 5:1) Additionally, I too have been a liar, a coward, and a thief, it is just that I am mindful to be repentant of these things and Aldrin is not yet. If I were to do it all over again, I am not sure I would have made the second film confronting the astronauts, as it even makes me a little uncomfortable to watch it. It is nevertheless, as some supporters of the Truth have noted, a benefit to the historical record when viewed in the future, that these men were given the opportunity to come clean, and they instead, adamantly chose to go to their graves with the poisonous lie they fed lifelong to their misled countrymen.
My life story regarding the “moon landings” is a true conversion story, much like an ancient religious leader who previously persecuted the Truth, whom then became the leader of the group he once opposed. My father was in the Air Force. As a result, I grew up around the latest aviation and technology. I loved it! On July 20th, 1969, I was only four years of age, quietly asleep in bed. My father, as a high-ranking military officer, was given a VIP package of commemorative photographs of the event, which he then gave to me as a cherished present. From the age of about four to fourteen, these pictures of the alleged moon landings covered an entire “sacred” wall in my bedroom. It was literally a shrine (like a religion) to the intellectual prowess of mankind. I saw these images, every day, three hundred sixty-five days a year, for ten years. This means I propagated the desired belief in their authenticity, three thousand six hundred fifty times before I even considered the possibility that they were misrepresentations of reality . . . That’s a lot of brainwashing!
Fortunately, at the open-minded age of fourteen, I saw an innovative television program featuring an interview with William Kaysing, a NASA contractor during the Apollo “moon missions”. He asserted quite confidently, from first hand eyewitness experience, that the impossible Apollo flights were staged to increase the prestige of the United States during the height of the Cold War, and while in the pit of domestic discontentment because of tens of thousands of young American men dying needlessly in an ambiguous foreign war in Vietnam. Nixon himself said at the time that the Vietnam War protests were the number one cause of American strife.
After watching this inaugural program suggesting a moon landing fraud, I went to my bedroom wall shrine of “moon landing” pictures and looked, for the very first time, with new eyes, at theses surprisingly telling photographs. Sure enough, just like Mr. Kaysing had said, stunning evidence of photographic anomalies were hidden in plain sight! (They say that this is the very best place to hide something investigators are looking for!) I just had to have “eyes that see”, after all, it had been historically said that most people “have eyes that do not see, and ears that do not hear”.
This tremendous oversight of mine is likened to a household salt shaker always being placed in the same place for ten years; left kitchen cabinet, on the third shelf, on the left side. If a family member inadvertently moves it to the same left kitchen cabinet, likewise on the third shelf, yet on the right side instead of on the left, you do not see it, even though it is right there in front of your eyes! There you stand, with the cabinet door wide open, the salt shaker right in front of you, only inches away (though on the right side of the same shelf where you always looked rather than on the left, where you were conditioned to not look), and you do not see it! Just as such, there I was, looking at the same pictures of the alleged moon landings, over and over again for, a full decade, yet not seeing quite obvious inconsistencies and abnormalities that would quickly give away the deceptive criminality of the event, if only I would look beyond my programming.
In a way, like naïve Adam and Eve, you can’t blame people for initially being deceived, after all, which is a more pleasant realm in which to live, one in which your country continually lies about history and spending, or one in which your country is honorable and honest? Naturally, most people would prefer to live in the latter, so they see the latter, just as we unconsciously overlook the flaws in a new romantic acquaintance with whom we are emotionally infatuated.
Fortunately, ten years after seeing the revealing interview with former NASA contractor William Kaysing at the age of fourteen, then at the age of twenty-four, I had become a filmmaker, and happened to be editing a movie one day for the very producer of the program I had seen ten years earlier which first brought to light the moon landing fraud to my attention. “Do you remember that man you had on your program who said that the moon landings were fake?” I asked the producer, “What is his name? I’d like to talk with him.” The rest is history.
I went from being the biggest fan of the “moon landings”, to becoming their most outspoken critic. Why? Because I was open-minded and willing to be wrong when the evidence presented itself to the contrary of my first opinion, even if that evidence was unpredicted, unprecedented, and quite discouraging.
It is actually easier to get away with a gigantic deception rather than a small one, because small lies are commonplace, and therefore anticipated, so that no one would expect or foresee the audacity of a grand deception. This is precisely the psychological tactic that was used by the CIA in precipitating and maintaining the monumental, yet very simple, lie of the “moon landings”.
During the domestically injurious riots protesting the Vietnam War, president Nixon decided that a unifying pep rally of a successful “moon landing” was just what the sickly American patient needed. Do you really think that Nixon was going to risk killing three “National Heroes” on live worldwide television, when simply failing to rescue kidnapped hostages would ruin your presidency for life (and especially your potential second term) as it did President Carter a few years later? How then could Nixon absolutely guarantee a successful “moon mission”? . . . To stage it . . . just like a skilled poker player’s bluff, not to mention that it was technologically impossible at the time to begin with, just as it is today, even with fifty years more advancements in computers and rockets. In fact, according to NASA contractor William Kaysing, who worked for six years on the Apollo program with high security clearance, a classified interdepartmental memo, which he personally read and edited, estimated the likelihood of a successful manned moon mission on the first attempt at a mere one in ten thousand chance. As NASA’s own staff at the time readily admitted was their standard motto in such instances, “If you can’t make it, fake it.”
Some assume that if the Soviet Union (Russian) or Chinese intelligence agencies found out that the American “moon landings” were fraudulent, they would immediately “spill the beans” (tell the truth) to the rest of the world without giving the highly important matter much deeper thought. This is simply not the case, and again, thinking only one step farther than programmed to do so, reveals the actual Truth. If wars are created for the profiteering of the “Military Industrial Complex”, as many forward thinking people including President Eisenhower now realize, then foreign “adversaries” of the United States may only be profitable creations thereof, solely existing in the propagandized minds of Americans, just as the “moon landings” did, brought about through the deceptive CIA’s mainstream media outlets, done so to benefit the billionaire military manufacturers, who in turn, help get their like-minded politicians elected, thus perpetuating this endless cycle of lucrative lies which mutually feed corrupted bureaucrats and corporate contractors alike.
Think about it: America has been engaged in a profitable war of some kind for 90% of its short history, yet never with Russia or China. As such, Russia and China are, in fact, allies of the United States, despite mainstream media and CIA fabrications which portray them, for financial gain, as “adversaries”, as trillions of dollars in regular annual mutually beneficial trading proves. (Just imagine a fake wrestling match in which both sides are paid by the same party.) This being the case, these overseas entities would not bring the Truth of such an American scandal as the moon landing fraud into the light to injure such an important monetary trading partner toward their own financial loss, not to mention that their own hidden skeletons would then be forced out of the closet in retaliation. Any “bad blood” the United States appears to have with these foreign powers is merely staged for the very purpose of keeping their complicity a secret, and the trillions of dollars in profitable military spending flowing.
Even if these two “super-powers” were actual enemies of America (which they are not), they still would not expose the Truth about the “moon missions”. For example, if I had a picture of a famous world leader with a prostitute, would it be more profitable for me to give the picture away to the media for free, or rather to blackmail the entrapped world leader, year after year, with ever increasing tolls? If such countries really were enemies of America and had proof of the moon landing fraud, which I suspect they probably do by now, it would serve their interests much more to keep such knowledge to themselves and blackmail the United States with the embarrassing information, year after year, administration after administration, to get the behind-the-scenes negotiations to favor them, whether it regards trade, arms, debt, or anything else they so desire. This is another good reason why the Truth coming out about the moon landing fraud would be beneficial for America. It would put an end to any potential blackmail about this past matter from foreign powers.
The fact is, there were no “independent” tracking stations for the Apollo missions. The only entities that had such capability were the United States’ own government agencies (who orchestrated the deception to begin with) and the aforementioned countries, who profited from keeping the secret. Additionally, NASA launched the “Tetra-A” satellite shortly before the Apollo missions, specifically designed to “simulate transmissions coming from the moon” so that the ground crews could rehearse the “moon landings” during their many simulations. Surreptitiously, it was purported that the Tetra-A satellite “accidentally burned up” in the earth’s atmosphere just before the first alleged moon mission, that way the government satellite could secretly still be in service, performing the same simulation function during the fake moon missions, convincing even the staff at NASA of their authenticity. In fact, an elderly retired NASA crew member recently acknowledged that . . .
“Our computers could tell no difference whatsoever between a ‘real’ and a ‘simulated’ moon mission.”
From Wikipedia regarding The Apollo Fraud:
“Some people insist that the Apollo moon landings were a Cold War deception of the Nixon administration. However, ’empirical’ evidence is readily available to show that manned moon landings did occur. Anyone on earth with an appropriate laser and telescope system can apparently bounce laser beams off three retro-reflector arrays reported to be left on the moon by Apollo 11, 14, and 15, suggesting deployment of the lunar laser ranging equipment at asserted Apollo moon landing sites, implying equipment constructed on earth was transported to the surface of the moon. In addition, in August 2009, NASA’s lunar reconnaissance orbiter claimed to send back high-resolution photos of the estimated Apollo landing sites. These government issued pictures show not only what is reported to be the faint shadows of the descent stages of the lunar landers allegedly left behind, but also apparent tracks of the astronauts’ walking paths nearby in the lunar dust.”
At first (and only) glance, these appear to be relevant arguments, yet each one is, surprisingly, most easily and unconditionally refuted with only a modicum of further investigation beyond the initial conditioned interpretation. First of all, it has recently come to light through employee “whistling blowing” that United States spy agencies regularly use “Wikipedia”, as well as hundreds of other websites, for deceitful misinformation purposes, as they can anonymously post intelligent sounding pro-government thesis to the masses, intentionally contradicting and smugly belittling Truthful “conspiracy theories” of very real crimes, of which they themselves have committed, in an attempt to conceal their own wrongdoing through such contrary postings.
The fact that billions of our tax dollars are being spent each year by the government for the very purpose of concealing their own past crimes by investing so many resources toward the perpetual lying to their own citizens, is utterly disgusting.
What high-ranking brave soul in their midst will come forward to save their fellow citizens with this simple Truth about the “moon landings”, in order to usher in the much needed governmental reform before our country sinks into oblivion?
When they use statements like “empirical evidence (Because the Emperor says so?) is readily available to show that the manned moon landings did occur”, it not only shows their arrogance (which, in and of itself, demonstrates their blindness to the facts), it also exemplifies their desperation to make an argument, that is so much losing ground, that they have to resort to the tactic of claiming that if you don’t agree with them, you are somehow deficient in intelligence. Again, if the “moon landings” are so obviously real (even though they cannot be repeated today with fifty years more advanced technology, and the farthest a man can travel from the earth to the moon today is only 1/1000th as far as they allegedly did half a century ago with antiquated equipment on the very first attempt), and there is no robust proof whatsoever of the missions deliberate falsification, then there would be no need whatsoever for the hundred plus films and websites, which took tens of thousands of hours to produce, solely dedicated to reassure the public of the “moon landings” genuineness! The fact that there are, is proof itself that mounting evidence does exist which proves the “moon missions” to be a CIA forgery, otherwise the deceptively claimed “obviousness” of their authenticity would speak for itself, without the repeated need of hundreds of websites and films to defend them. When a structure needs such continual precarious support and maintenance, this alone is evidence that the structure itself is not sound to begin with.
First of all, it was proven in 1962 that a laser can be bounced and calibrated off of the moon without a manmade reflector thereon, simply due to the reflectivity of the lunar surface. NASA just cleverly designated these reflective locations as “landing sites” for the very purpose of contriving this evidence. Furthermore, Russia put a manmade mirror on the moon’s surface during the same time of the “Apollo” missions, using instead an un-manned probe that would not have to suffer the biological ravages of lethal space radiation en route, one of the main reasons NASA was, and still is, unable to send humans to the moon. Additionally, seeing how all of these lasers have their data computer controlled, it would only take one computer hacker to manipulate the information shown on a viewing screen, making even the employees of NASA ignorant of the actual facts. (This was precisely the case at “mission control” during the “moon missions”, where dozens of computer “operators”, actually just read the contrived preprogrammed data on their screens like news anchors, who do not write their own words, openly admitting afterwards that they could tell no difference whatsoever between a “real” flight and a “simulation”.)
Secondly, to say that additional “new” photographs from the criminal NASA are evidence that “prove” the alleged moon landings were real . . . is laughable. NASA already faked high resolution, full body pictures, of an astronaut supposedly standing right on the “moon’s surface” nearly fifty years ago, so what is it to fake additional pictures now, with almost five decades better “Photoshop” technology, of such simple things as alleged tiny shadows of lunar landers or supposed faint footpaths, from miles above the moon’s surface, allegedly taken from untrustworthy NASA’s orbiting satellites? These diehard believers are just seeing what they want to see, like a naïve spouse of a cheating partner, accepting the fox’s evidence that they didn’t steal a chicken.
Additional arguments against the fraud are reported to be the hundreds of thousands of people throughout the industry who contributed to the “moon missions”, who allegedly would have been informed of the fraud and kept it a secret. Again, seemingly a reasonable argument, yet it is not with only a little extra thought. Do you really think the CIA would be so careless as to tell hundreds of thousands of low-level contractors the goings-on of a top-top-secret project? Would the CIA really be so inept as to tell the person making the rocket’s door handle, or the glove or the boot of the spacesuit, that they were secretly faking the moon landings and to be sure not to tell anyone?! Do we really think the CIA is stupid enough to tell hundreds of thousands of low-level workers something they wanted to keep as a strict secret?! Furthermore, to say that “because my uncle worked at NASA and believed the ‘moon landings’ were real is proof that they were real”, is like saying that because my uncle worked as a vender at the Super Bowl and believed that the game was honest, that this is proof that the football players didn’t cheat in their game.
Just like a pyramid of power in any business, what the employee, the manager, and the regional manager knows about the business’ actual agenda, is completely different than what the CEO at the very top knows. Remember, there were only three people (“trusted” government employees) who were actually there at the time of the “moon missions”, with no independent press coverage whatsoever. As demonstrated in my film “A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon”, the three crew members were indeed on the rocket, they did launch into earth orbit on July 16th, 1969 (to attain realistic “zero gravity” flight photography within the spacecraft), they did splash down in the ocean eight days later (to establish the authenticity), yet the rest of the mission, everything beyond earth orbit (which is only as far as astronauts can go today with fifty years more advanced technology), was completely contrived, like a masterful illusionist, by satellite data manipulation, complete media control, and professional movie sets. After all, what is easier to do, to actually build a rocket and travel to another planet with 1960’s technology on the very first attempt, or to simply make a movie set about it? The age-old argument “The simplest explanation is the True one“, which many Apollo proponents deceptively use to suggest the “moon missions” were real, actually proves the fraud instead!
The simple fact is, it is easier to fake a moon mission than to actually do one . . . the exact reason why the film “The Martian” was filmed in an earthly simulated television studio, rather than on Mars.
Another overlooked fact is that, according to their own “Scientific Method”, a “Scientific” claim, such as the “manned moon landings” of the 1960’s, in order to be considered authentic, must be Independently Verified and Duplicated by a Third Party, which has never been done regarding the “Apollo” missions, as only the corrupt United States government, alone, has claimed that this feat was possible, on the very first attempt, with antiquated 1960’s technology, even though no nation on earth can repeat the claim, even with fifty years more advancements in rockets and computers. This is precisely why, if someone today made the claim of perfecting “cold fusion”, yet said that they could not repeat their successful experiment for another fifty years, they would be laughed off of the planet . . . Yet . . . This is not the standard for the “manned moon landing” claims of America in the 1960’s, which cannot be repeated by any nation on earth, even fifty years later, when today the farthest NASA can send an astronaut is only 1/1000th the distance as they claimed to have done on the first try half a century ago! This “event” has become a god of America’s greatness, causing even “scientific intellectuals” to intentionally overlook highly valid criticism thereof, because it insults their self-aggrandized narcissistic idol.
Some of the best evidence proving the fraud is the fact that in 1998, when the space shuttle flew to its highest altitude ever, 365 miles, one third higher than they normally flew, mission control asked the crew to descend to a lower altitude due to lethal space radiation they encountered, by approaching too close to the “Van Allen Radiation Belts”, which don’t even begin until one thousand miles altitude (and continue for an additional 25,000 miles). That is to say, they were 635 miles away from radiation that was so intense, that the crew reported they could see the radiation with their eyes closed as sparks of light hitting the retinas of their closed eyes, and were subsequently told to descend away from it. When this happened, CNN inadvertently and unknowingly, reported the moon landing fraud by stating . . .
“The radiation belt surrounding earth is more dangerous than previously believed.”
Apparently, not a single journalist on the entire planet figured out, except for myself, that this statement totally contradicts the authenticity of the “moon landings” . . . Here’s why . . .
The only time in world history when human beings have claimed to have traveled through the 25,000 mile thick radiation field called the “Van Allen Radiation Belts” (which, unbeknownst to most, surrounds the Earth starting at an altitude of one thousand miles and extends 25,000 miles beyond that) is during the alleged Apollo “moon missions”, as all other manned missions, from every country on earth, including the United States (such as Gemini, Mercury, Soyuz, Skylab, the Space Shuttle, and the current International Space Station), all orbited about 750 miles below this dangerous radiation field (merely 250 miles above the Earth’s surface), specifically out of safety concerns for the lethal radiation above them. Even airline crews, 240 miles below this orbital altitude, are subject to health concerns from this hazardous radiation, so all the more for astronauts, twenty times higher than they at merely 250 miles above the earth in the space shuttle and space station.
Why is it then that Space Shuttle astronauts, some 635 miles away from this intense radiation, twenty-nine years after the first alleged moon mission, knew more about this radiation than the Apollo astronauts who claimed they were in the middle of it to the moon and back? Remember, the Space Shuttle crew’s recent discovery proves that this large radiation field is “more dangerous than previously believed”. What is “previously believed” if not based on the previous reports from the “experts” of the radiation field, the Apollo crews, who were allegedly the only ones in all of world history to have ever traveled through this radiation, with no ill health effects of any kind and no reports of the visible sparks of radiation being seen, as were later reported by the Shuttle crew from 635 miles away from the radiation!
Of course, this is simply not possible if the “moon missions” were real.
What does this mean?
It means that the “moon mission” astronauts, who previously claimed to have been inside of this large radiation field lied about being there! Of course, if the “Apollo” crews never went through the Van Allen Radiation Belt, as this contradictory report reveals, then they certainly could not have gone to the moon either, which the traversing of this radiation would require. This is precisely why, nearly fifty years later, all that astronauts from any nation on earth can do, including the United States, is orbit the earth at about 250 miles altitude. Seeing how the Space shuttle has killed fourteen people just orbiting at 250 miles above the Earth, and that with well proven, three decades newer technology than the “Apollo” program had, it is quite a conundrum that thirty years earlier, with antiquated untried machinery, NASA claims to have gone 1000 Times farther, six times, without any fatalities or radiation problems whatsoever, and that with inaugural equipment.
According to the highly esteemed “National Research Council”, a private nonprofit scientific think-tank which submits recommendations to NASA based on the latest scientific findings, radiation beyond Earth orbit is so dangerous that “returning to the moon” is deemed impossible until better ways are found to protect astronauts from this lethal radiation. The question is, if the NRC says that “returning” to the moon is impossible today until better ways are found to protect astronauts from lethal space radiation beyond earth orbit (such as the Van Allen Radiation Belts), then how did men reach the moon on their very first attempt with 1960’s technology, or better still, why not simply use the same outstanding methodology and equipment that the supposed first moon crews had to protect themselves from the lethal space radiation rather than reinventing the wheel?
Likewise, when Bush Jr. was president, he went on national television and proclaimed that “The United States will return to the moon as a logical first step to Mars and beyond”. Did no one besides me notice that if they already really went to the moon six times, why would they need to do a “first” step over again for the seventh time? He was even so bold as to go on to say that “First we will need to learn how to protect astronauts from lethal space radiation.” Am I the only one curious enough to ask, “Why not do it the same way that worked so well the first time they went to the moon in 1969?”
Why does no journalist, except me, connect the obvious dots with this very revealing information? Because the dots lead to a horrific Truth that would appall the entire American nation, demanding that their government be re-formed. It is simply because “journalists” are part of the CIA’s media empire that they do not report anything that would cause their very own undoing.
In December of 2014, NASA sent their brand new “Orion” spacecraft, un-manned, directly into the Van Allen Radiation Belt, to a 3,600 mile altitude, and then promptly u-turned it for a return to earth.
What is worth studying at 3,600 miles?
The Van Allen Radiation Belts.
According to NASA, the purpose of the “Orion” mission was to . . . “to test the instruments”. What “instruments” were onboard the Orion spacecraft? Two Geiger Counters to measure the radiation inside of the radiation belts that are necessary to traverse to reach the moon.
Didn’t NASA already have these measurements decades ago from the Apollo moon missions, if indeed men actually went through the radiation belts to the moon and back? Why is it so important to “test the instruments” at a 3,600 mile altitude inside of the radiation belts? . . .
To see if humans can survive transversing it . . .
. . . for the very first time!
Apparently today’s new generation of NASA engineers, some in their twenty’s, have stumbled upon this significant NASA contradiction. Though they were probably led into the space exploration field by the motivation of the seemingly easy “moon missions” of the 1960’s, the fact that such an acclaimed feat cannot be repeated today, with five decades more advanced technology, and that aside from theses alleged “moon missions” of the Nixon administration, no one has ever gone more than 400 miles away from the earth in the nearly fifty years since, the trip to the moon being 1000 Times farther than the space station is today, must make their positions with this newly discovered Truth quite precarious.
Kelly Smith, one of these twenty-ish engineers, was selected as the official “Orion” mission spokesperson in the following NASA video press release. Notice that at 43 seconds into the film, Smith confirms that the radiation belts are made up of “Extreme Radiation”. At time 3:06 he again refers to the belts as “Dangerous Radiation”. Finally at time 3:36, for the third time, Smith plainly states . . .
“We must solve these (radiation) challenges before we send people through this region of space.”
The question is, if the solution to the dangerous radiation belt problem has yet to be invented (“We must solve these challenges before we send people through this region of space.”), then how is it that the Apollo crews during their alleged “moon missions” went through this dangerous and extreme radiation nearly fifty years ago when the necessary equipment to survive doing so has yet to be invented?! (“We must solve these challenges before we send people through this region of space.”)
When I asked NASA’s press office if I could interview Kelly Smith about this matter, they refused to grant him permission to talk with me. When I emailed a list of mostly harmless questions about the Orion mission, NASA politely answered all of them. When I submitted a more difficult inquiry about Kelly Smith’s three statements about the dangerous radiation of the Van Allen Belts and how the radiation problem must be solved before NASA can send astronauts through them, NASA refused to reply to these questions, as if I had never asked them. When I asked for the radiation readings of the Orion spacecraft’s two onboard Geiger Counters, NASA said that such measurements were “a secret” and that I would have to file a “Freedom of Information Act” request to attain the information. When I asked why such ordinary data about the radiation belt’s strength is a secret, NASA refused to answer and then terminated all further communication with me. (Just 1 REM of radiation per hour is five times a lethal dose. As you will read later below, the radiation belts contain up to 100 REM per hour.)
When NASA sent publicly funded probes and spacecraft to measure the temperature of the sun and the amount of hydrogen in Jupiter’s atmosphere, this information was readily available to scientists and to the public, after all, why would a measurement of a part of nature be a secret? Likewise, the amount radiation in the Van Allen Radiation Belts which surround the Earth is simply a part of nature, and as such, there is no reason whatsoever why such elementary measurements of nature should be a government secret . . . unless disclosing such measurements would reveal the impossibility of the Apollo crews having gone through them and surviving with decades older technology, especially seeing how NASA just acknowledged, accidentally or otherwise, that such protection from this “Dangerous” and “Extreme” radiation has yet to be invented by the space agency and “must” be invented “before we send people through this region of space.”
Quite interesting . . . Yes?
James Van Allen, the discoverer of the radiation belts, originally said that they were “100-1000 times more radioactive than a lethal dose”! Under pressure from NASA, he dramatically recanted his original findings in order to make it appear as if the moon landings were possible. Don’t believe me? Below is the link to his original published findings in the respected national journal “Scientific American”, in which Van Allen spoke plainly about the radiation belts beyond earth orbit being “an obstacle for practical space travel to the moon and beyond”, just as Kelly Smith of the “Orion” mission did.
Van Allen himself said this, immediately after NASA sent probes with Geiger counters into the radiation belts in 1958:
“Our measurements show that the maximum radiation level as of 1958 is equivalent to between 10 and 100 REM per hour, depending on the still undetermined proportion of protons to electrons. Since a human being exposed for two days to even 10 REM would have only an even chance of survival, the radiation belts obviously present an obstacle to space flight.”
Occupational safety limits for radiation is 5 REM over an entire year, as the danger is calculated by the amount of REM and the period over which it is received, and thereby gradually absorbed, so that the body may have time to incrementally expel the radiation before it reaches a lethal level. Absorbing 5 REM of radiation in just an hour, rather than a year, is 24 times a lethal dose. 10 REM of radiation absorbed in an hour is therefore 48 times more lethal a dose than 10 REM gradually absorbed and expelled over two days (or 48 hours), which Van Allen himself said was already a lethal dose (as calculated by it killing 50 percent of those exposed to it). Rounding 48 times a lethal dose per hour in the radiation belts up to 50 (for the slightly longer than an hour trip through them to leave Earth orbit and reach the moon) and then doubling the amount for the return from the moon through the radiation belts again to reenter Earth orbit, this is, according to Van Allen himself, a minimum of 100 times a lethal dose and a maximum of 1000 times a lethal dose for the trip to the moon and back.
The “Apollo” spacecraft had inferior shielding (1/8th of an inch of aluminum) compared to that of a medical x-ray technician, who wears a much more effective lead vest (lead being prohibitive to launch into space because of its exceeding excessive weight), even though the radiation exposure to a chest x-ray is 1/5000th of the radiation exposure to the Van Allen radiation belts, and that only for a split second, rather than continually for more than two hours during the alleged trip to the moon and back. Some misinformed and grasping NASA fans have falsely claimed that the Apollo astronauts did not go through the radiation belts while others claim that they only went through weak fringe parts thereof (though NASA never made any such claims), yet this is a scientific impossibility unless the launches took place at the North or South Poles where there are small openings in the belts (as Van Allen clearly stated at the end of the above article), as there was no additional fuel available to zigzag around them and launching closest to the equator as possible, where the radiation belts are strongest, permitted the necessary fuel savings.
Launching at the poles would be virtually impossibility due to the cold temperatures, at least 50 degrees Fahrenheit (19 C) or more below safe launch temperatures (because the cold dramatically deteriorates sensitive launch equipment), as the Space Shuttle Challenger’s cold launch explosion at just 36 degrees Fahrenheit (2 C) already proved was deadly. What these diehard unresearched supporters of the fraud have inadvertently admitted, is that yes indeed the radiation belts are deadly, just as Van Allen and NASA’s own Kelly Smith acknowledged in the “Orion” mission video press release. By desperately saying the crews went around the radiation belts in a forlorn attempt to prove the missions were real (even though NASA claims the crews went right through the most intense part of the radiation), in their acknowledgement of the belt’s lethality, they have themselves unknowingly conceded that the missions were scientifically impossible.
Even self-proclaimed “moon” astronaut Alan Bean, when I interviewed him unprepared for my challenging questions, accidentally admitted on camera that he did not travel through the lethal Van Allen radiation belts (which he would have to in order to reach the moon). When I pointed out this error to him, he corrected himself by saying, “Maybe we did (go through the radiation belts)”. When I asked him if he experienced any unusual phenomenon from traveling through the radiation belts, he said “No”. When I pointed out to him that a crew of the space shuttle, decades after his alleged moon mission, on the highest altitude of any space shuttle flight, more than 600 miles away from just the beginning of the intense radiation belts, experienced radiation that was so severe, even from that great distance away, that they could see the radiation as sparks of lights through their closed eyelids, Bean then suddenly remembered seeing the same phenomenon! When I pointed out to him that I believed that this space shuttle crew was the first of any astronauts in history to report this strange optical radiation phenomenon, he changed his story a third time to keep up with the revelatory information, and immediately recanted what he had just said about seeing the radioactive “sparks of light” in the first place! . . . Absolutely amazing! (Did I mention the fact that each astronaut who was interviewed by me at length asked for Two Thousand Dollars an Hour in cash for the honor of being lied to?)
Which is it guys?! Get your stories straight!
In August of 2009 it was reported, albeit as a news oddity (and it certainly was) that a “moon rock”, personally given to the president of the Netherlands by Neil Armstrong in 1969 (who supposedly hand picked it off of the moon’s surface himself), was opened forty years later from its hermitically sealed container by a curious museum curator after they had watched “A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon”. Following microscopic examination, the rock was verified to actually be a forgery! (A deceptive “another worldly” looking piece of petrified wood instead!) Yet again, not a single journalist, except for myself, asked the question, “If the moon rocks are fake . . . What about the moon missions?”
After Neil Armstrong’s departure from this mortal coil, in 2012, his widow found a “bag of moon souvenirs” in the back of his closet. The problem is, for Armstrong’s entire life, he said that these specific items were left on the moon! (Talk about “coming out of the closet”!)
When I discovered absolute proof (actual, on camera evidence) that the Apollo astronauts never left earth orbit (contained in a newly discovered unedited NASA reel which was never broadcast to the public; debuted in “A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon”) and presented this controversial videotape to a news director at NBC, he turned pale white, practically fainted, and collapsed in his chair exclaiming, “Oh, my God! It looks like we didn’t go to the moon!”
“I know”, I said, “What do we do?”
This man, who held the betterment of America in his hand, thought for a long time . . . and then eventually . . . “chickened out”. He said, “I cannot broadcast this with a clear conscious. It will cause a civil war. I will not be the one responsible for that.”
While I disagree that the public knowing the Truth about the “moon missions” would cause a civil war, Americans would probably demand immense government reform, or possibly a new institution thereof, as well as start investigating other matters of their yet uncovered dark corruption and deception. Naturally, government criminals would rather not get caught and preserve their underhanded way of life, which the release of this Truth would inevitably bring. This is precisely why my film has never been broadcast, only to be seen on DVD and Youtube. Instead, numerous networks (owned by bedfellows of the government) have broadcast a dozen full-length documentaries as to why my well-known film’s accusations are “unfounded”.
If more people would only view with an open, deprogrammed mind, “A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon”, which contains newly discovered video evidence of the moon landing fraud, then they would see, with their own eyes, these recently uncovered unedited behind-the-scenes outtakes of false photography from the first “moon mission”, which prove the deception beyond any doubt. In fact, four out of five people who actually view this footage, who previously thought the alleged “moon landings” were real, recant their faith in the supposed mission’s authenticity. Thusly you can see why broadcasters are terrified to present this extremely condemning evidence to the public. If they did so, plainly acknowledging as the news director did that this proves the “moon missions” were a government deception, then not only would they be admitting the mainstream media’s own complicity in the fraud by being the means through which this lie was disseminated, the public would also call into question the very foundational integrity of the government, possibly leading to its immediate restructuring, as well as the media’s, for their own participation in this deplorable dishonesty.
The unedited outtakes of which I speak, were never broadcast to the public. In them, Neil Armstrong is using a one-foot diameter model of the Earth, inside of the spacecraft from low Earth orbit, to create the illusion for the television audience, that he and his crew are halfway to the moon, when they are, in reality, still in Earth orbit, from which they never left. (After all, this is as far as an astronaut can travel today, fifty years later.) This is absolute proof that, though they were on the rocket at launch and achieved Earth orbit, the crew never went any farther, again, just as far as they can go today, with half a century improvements in rockets and computers.
This revealing footage is even dated by NASA’s own computer clock as having taken place two days into Armstrong’s flight, when he is supposed to be halfway to the moon, or some “135,000 miles away from the Earth”, yet he and his crew are clearly shown in these revealing outtakes to still be in Earth orbit two days after the launch, and are instead, falsifying the television photography to deceive the viewing public as to their real location. The CIA is even heard on a private, third audio channel, prompting Armstrong to respond to Mission Control’s questions only after four seconds have elapsed, in order to create the false impression of an increased radio delay, so as to appear to be much farther from the Earth than he and his crew actually were. To best understand this important evidence, a second viewing may be advised, as I too had to look at the newly discovered footage again to realize its incredible significance.
At 32:03 – 40:50 in “A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon” you can view these newly discovered unedited outtakes of Neil Armstrong falsifying mission photography during the historic and now infamously falsified flight, as well as hear the CIA themselves secretly prompting the crew, instructing them to wait four seconds before answering NASA, in order to give the false impression of the great distance of claiming to be half way to the moon at that time, which would cause an increased radio delay in their response.
Do to the obvious genuineness of the footage I uncovered (as it precisely matches NASA’s other broadcasts in which they claim the very same footage to be “authentic”), NASA had to acknowledge that this newly discovered unedited behind-the-scenes video from the first “moon mission” (which debuted in “A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon”) is indeed authentic, they simply said that I was “misinterpreting” it. Misguided diehard fans of NASA and detractors of my documentary on the internet elaborated a bit more, to their very own demise. They plainly acknowledged the simple fact that the crew was indeed falsifying the photography of being “halfway to the moon” in these newly discovered outtakes of mission photography (as nearly everyone has the mind to see and admit after examining it), claiming instead though that the crew was doing so to merely “rehearse” an upcoming scene for the television viewers.
The fact is, this “moon mission” cost about Thirteen Million Dollars Per Minute in today’s value. As such, the last thing the crew would do, would be wasting their precious time, and limited weight, carrying and creating a model of the Earth in space at an alleged distance of halfway to the moon, when the real Earth from a distance halfway to the moon was supposed to be right outside their window! If the crew was “rehearsing”, then they would have just “rehearsed” with the real Earth out the window rather than wasting valuable time creating an unnecessary model of what supposedly really existed a few feet away! Furthermore, the edited and approved segments of this exact footage, those without the errors I uncovered which give the illusion away, appear in numerous NASA documentaries where their narrator refers to the very same material as “genuinely” being half way to the moon! Additionally, with their already being talk at the time by 10% of Americans that the mission was disingenuous government propaganda, the last thing NASA would ever do, if the mission was real, would be to risk falsifying any of it, for the fear that they would be accused of such dishonesty, if indeed the mission was real.
What critics have inadvertently done, is acknowledged that the first “moon crew” falsified part of their photography!
The fact is, if they really went to the moon, there would be no need to falsify any of the photography!
Just as if only one ingredient at a salad bar is contaminated with poison it fails the entire health inspection, having discovered only one reel of false footage is enough to disqualify the “reality” of all the missions!
All that critics were left with to say in their desperate attempt to extinguish the blazing fire of the Truth contained in this remarkable newly uncovered, unedited behind-the-scenes footage of outtakes of blatant false photography from the first “moon mission”, was a feeble effort to diminish its significance by falsely claiming that it was “no big discovery because the video is readily available to the public”. These people are obviously lying through their teeth. It says in big letters, right at the beginning of the newly discovered reel, “Not for Public Distribution”.
When someone has to lie to defend something, this is proof itself that what they are defending is a lie.
Take it from someone who has personally and exhaustively gone through the entire NASA archives, more than any journalist or diehard fan of the “moon missions” has ever done. This is the only un-edited reel available. Absolutely everything else is pre-edited. My detractors know this, and shortly after my film debuted, they borrowed some of the footage to hastily put into their new pro-NASA releases (as it was never shown previously, proving conclusively that is was not “readily available to the public”), in their dying attempt to minimize the important discovery. In their version of my newly discovered footage though, they specifically deleted the most incriminating video segments, as well as the revealing audio of the CIA prompting the astronauts with “Talk” at the beginning of the deplorable fraudulent footage, done so to remind Armstrong to respond to Mission Control’s questions only after four seconds have elapsed, so as to create the false impression of an increased radio delay and thusly appearing to be much farther away from the Earth than he and his crew actually were. Why would they delete this important betraying audio in their films, if this newly discovered hidden track of secret communications revealed nothing of the forgery?
Not too long ago, I interviewed the second man to not walk on the moon, Edwin “Buzz” Aldrin. He sat down with me thinking that I was going to interview him in order to help him make money off of a book he was promoting. Instead, I had a television monitor set up to ask him about the newly discovered unedited outtakes of false photography from his “moon mission”, in which he was actually the camera operator orchestrating the deception.
You have to understand, at that moment, with two professional television cameras there, a crew of about five people, as well as professional lights and microphones, Aldrin thought, for a brief moment, that the news story of the moon landing fraud had just broken worldwide. It was at this time that he exclaimed in anger (at time 8:58 – 9:11 in the sequel to my film entitled “Astronauts Gone Wild”), “And this makes you a real famous person that has discovered this and reveals all this stuff! What an ego you must have to want to propel yourself (your career) like this!” The question is, if I was wrong with my discovery, how could I become famous from exposing nothing? Therefore, this statement itself is an admission of guilt, as he didn’t say I was wrong with my revelation, rather he said that I had impure motives for revealing this Truth to the world.
Aldrin even shouted back (at time 8:30 – 8:38), “Well you’re talking to the wrong guy! Why don’t you talk to the administrator of NASA! We’re (only) passengers! We’re guys going on a flight!”
As Aldrin was “only a passenger“, as he plainly stated, then that certainly means that he never piloted the lunar module to the moon’s surface, as he previous claimed, because a passenger and a pilot are certainly very different from one another. (Merely orbiting the earth for eight days, entirely under the control of NASA, is what made him a passenger, not a pilot, as he firmly admitted.)
Aldrin finally remembered that I was not with “ABC” (news) as he previously believed, rather “ABC-Digital”, the name of my independent television production company at the time. At this point, when he realized that the discovery of the fraud was isolated, by an independent television producer, not yet broadcast worldwide by a major television network, he started backpedaling on his admission of guilt and started to reassert, though not very convincingly, his mission’s alleged authenticity. When Aldrin finally realized that he had made critical errors in judgment by acknowledging twice, with the above two statements, that I was right in regard to my discovery of the Truth, he threatened to sue me if I showed his on-camera admissions of guilt to anyone. Certainly if these two statements were not admissions of guilt, he would have no problem releasing them to the public.
Seeing how my job as a filmmaker of more than thirty years is to make fake scenes look real, this specific expertise of mine is how I first discerned that the “moon missions” were filmed inside of a television studio with electrical light, rather than with sunlight on a natural exterior landscape as was falsely claimed. In fact, more than two decades ago, in showing a colleague of mine (with many more years of professional filmmaking experience than I had at the time) a recent dramatic film I had just completed, he complimented me by saying, “I really liked the way you captured the sunset at the end of your movie.” I smiled and said, “That was actually an electrical light, not the sun.”
In the case of the “moon” scenes that were allegedly lit solely with the bright sunlight on the atmosphereless moon, the shadows from one object (or person) compared to another, should always, without exception, run parallel with one another and never intersect. Yet, in several of the photographs allegedly taken on the moon, shadows from one object or person run at a different angel than the other and eventually intersect. This would absolutely never happen in sunlight, as the sun, the alleged only light source in the “moon” pictures, is one million times bigger in volume than the Earth, and therefore evenly lights in the exact same direction of any given area over the entire Earth.
According to NASA, no electrical lighting whatsoever was used on any of the “moon missions”, simply because of allegedly being on a heavenly body in very bright sunlight, which doesn’t have clouds or atmosphere, made supplemental lighting completely unnecessary and a waste of precious electrical power and weight. In fact, according to NASA, because the moon has no atmosphere of any kind, the sunlight there is twenty times brighter than on the Earth, so the last thing any photographer on the moon would need is an electrical light that would cast intersecting shadows, unless of course they were really in an enclosed film studio.
In a “National Geographic” television special on how the moon landing hoax was supposed to not be a hoax at all, in a vain attempt to bury the emerging Truth, they went to a California desert at night to “simulate” the alleged conditions on the moon. They dressed up an actor in an “astronaut” costume, had them stand a few feet apart from a fellow television crewmember, brought in one electrical light to simulate the sun, and basically said, “See! The shadows of the two people standing near one another do intersect in our ‘moon simulation’, so filmmaker Bart Sibrel is wrong.”
The very simple fact is this: Why didn’t they just wait 12 hours and use the very same desert during the day with real sunlight to accurately depict the very same sunlit condition on the moon?! The filmmakers claimed, “We can’t duplicate the sun”, yet they easily could have if they only filmed in the very same spot 12 hours earlier, in natural sunlight! They went on national television trying to prove “A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon” wrong with the exact same evidence that proves me right . . . all the while telling the viewers the exact opposite!
The point is, their shadows in their little demonstration intersected because their “moon simulation” was lit with electrical light! . . . All the while they claimed that this proved that the moon missions were real, when their very demonstration proved that the moon missions were fake instead! Think about it! In their “moon simulation”, with electrical light, the shadows did intersect, just like in some of the NASA “moon” pictures. Yet, they said, “These results directly contradict the conspiracy claims” (which are that the pictures from NASA on the “moon” were lit with electrical light, not sunlight). They told this blatant lie in a deceptive attempt to confuse the viewer from seeing the Truth, when in fact, these very results of theirs proved the conspiracy claims to be True rather than false!
They went to the desert at night, allegedly, to get a black background like on the moon, yet this was not the point of the experiment. The point of the experiment was to see which of the two casts parallel shadows: sunlight (as claimed by NASA) or electrical light (as claimed by me), because the assertion I made in my film was that the reason the shadows intersect in some of the NASA pictures is because they were lit with electrical light in a film studio instead of sunlight outside on the moon as they falsely claimed, where the shadows would never intersect!
Did you get this?
The “National Geographic” Channel (a propaganda arm of the United States government) simulated the “moon” pictures (matched them) by using electrical light, not sunlight, which means that the Apollo pictures were taken with electrical light, not sunlight, meaning they were taken on earth! . . . All the while they tried to mislead the audience into believing the exact opposite of the Truth, that this deceptive “evidence” of theirs proved the moon mission’s authenticity, when in fact this exact evidence proves the exact opposite, that the NASA pictures were also taken with electrical light, and this is precisely why the shadows intersected in their reenactment, as well as the NASA pictures, because they were both taken on Earth with electrical light, which caused the intersecting shadows!
The National Geographic program further lied in their “special” when they said “only a very small group of people believe that the moon missions were fraudulent”. Really? Is 60 million of 300 million Americans a “very small group”? (Not to mention approximately 4 billion others, in other non-brainwashed countries, that perceive the Truth!) If the group of believers of the Truth is so “very small”, as they falsely claimed, then what is the esteemed “National Geographic” Channel doing wasting an entire expensive hour of television, and tens of thousands of dollars in production costs, trying to convince such a “small minority” out of their “crazy” and “insignificant” error? Obviously these extensive resources are being spent because of the growing millions of Americans who are awakening to their senses, that networks like these are trying to keep the multitudes perpetually deceived and asleep to overlook their ongoing crimes.
Their own “expert” on the program, as to the “moon landing’s” alleged authenticity, the one of such astuteness that he proved my film right when he was trying to prove it wrong, admitted that his life’s work is to convince people that the “moon landings” were real. Why would this be anyone’s life’s work if the “moon missions” were so “unquestionably real”, the numbers opposed to him were so “very small”, and the people opposed to his belief were merely “crazy” as the program insinuated? Would you spend your entire life’s energy trying to convince crazy people who thought that the country’s first president was Mickey Mouse that it was really George Washington? Of course not. The amount of time, energy, and expensive resources spent on this and a hundred other films and websites to convince accused defective simpletons of the alleged “obviousness” of the claimed moon landings, itself speaks of deliberate propagandizing of a lie.
Even the scene at time 30:38 – 31:06 in “A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon”, in which the astronauts appear to be “floating” around in 1/6th gravity, is so obviously a simple, yet very convincing, “slow motion” effect, that when they showed the same clip from my film in their deceptive “National Geographic” television special, which was specifically created to disprove my damaging film, they deliberately “zoomed in” on this footage, far beyond the soles of the astronaut’s feet and the dirt on which they walked, intentionally so that the viewers could not see the astronauts only getting the same half inch above the ground as they also do here on earth, which my film specifically exemplified as condemning evidence. When you simply double the speed of the footage with professional video equipment, it becomes blatantly obvious that the seemingly convincing “1/6th gravity floating effect” is nothing more than a rudimentary, yet effective, “slow motion” effect. Truly, this alone proves that they were not on the moon, where they should have been able to leap several feet off of the ground, which they accomplished in later “missions” with hidden cables to overcome this initial error on their part. This program’s deliberate concealment and misrepresentation of the facts itself proves that my claims are true, otherwise they would have no need to do this.
“Myth Busters” did the very same thing as the “National Geographic” special, by lighting their simulated “moonscape” with electrical light rather than sunlight, in an inverted attempt to simulate the lighting conditions on the moon, when in reality what they really did is prove that NASA’s “moon” picture were taken with electrical light rather that sunlight, meaning they were taken in a film studio, as no electrical lights were brought to the moon. Why they, like the others, did not use sunlight to simulate sunlight is beyond me, unless their real intention was to deceptively mislead the television viewers into wrongly believing this “reenactment” of theirs with electrical light proved the mission’s authenticity, when in fact this very methodology actually proves the exact opposite, as they too duplicated the intersecting shadows of the “moon” pictures with electrical light rather than sunlight, proving again that NASA’s “moon” pictures were lit with electrical light rather than sunlight, therefore in a film studio, likewise all the while they too lied to their television audience by saying that their deceptive technique proved the exact opposite of the Truth . . . Amazing.
As before, if this misrepresentation was intentional, then deliberately lying to make a contested point proves that their position is false to begin with. If such an inversion of the Truth was accidental, then it proves their complete incompetence on the subject. Either way, it proves that the “moon landings” were lit with electrical light and thereby indeed false, completely contrary to their grossly misleading presentation.
It was when I pointed out these deceptions or errors of theirs that the producers of these two shows (who I believe were NASA surrogates) recanted to have me on their programs, or deleted my previously recorded interviews from their content, because not only did I prove that the “moon landings” were fraudulent beyond any doubt, I also exposed their blatantly deceptive and backwards methodology to make their misleading points to a beguiled public, something they were not about to broadcast.
If a television program about the moon landing “conspiracy theory” refuses to have on their show the world’s leading advocate on this very subject, or deliberately deletes conclusive evidence from him of the fraud from their content, then how can they at all be trusted to be presenting the Truth in the first place? If the “moon landings” are so obviously real and incontestable as they falsely claimed, then they would let me speak uncensored about their fraudulent methodology, and show the newly discovered, and highly condemning, unedited video evidence without any fear whatsoever, which neither of them risked doing. Thusly, the final lie of theirs was that their program on this subject was a real open debate of the issue, rather than a production whose sole purpose was to reassure the doubting public that this age old deception which is steadfastly coming to light is still trustworthy despite overwhelming mounting evidence.
Do you see how upside-down the Truth is presented on television? The real “myth” is that the “moon landings” took place with 1960’s technology, on the very first attempt, allegedly going 1000 times farther than the space station is or any man can travel today, with five decades older technology. This is the myth they should be busting. Instead, they are a propaganda arm of the corrupt United States government and the CIA, whose native language is lies, saying that the Truth is a myth, and that a myth is the Truth . . . all the while the corrupt government charges their citizens, billions of dollars in taxes, for the honor of being lied to by their deceptive “leaders” . . . Utterly disgusting.
Do you have eyes that Truly perceive . . .
or only eyes which see,
what the magician wants you to see?
NBC, my old alma mater, for a program on their affiliate the “Discovery Channel”, paid me thousands of dollars, flew me to New York City, put me up in the very expensive Waldorf Astoria hotel, all because a new, independent-minded producer of theirs wanted to air my side of the story, as well as exclusively showcase the first network broadcast of my newly discovered unedited video evidence of the behind-the-scenes photographic fraud from the first “moon mission”. (Remember, another NBC news director previously viewed the very same evidence and promptly concluded that it conclusively proved the moon landing fraud, though disappointedly said, “I cannot air this. It will cause a civil war”.) This new NBC producer told me, after editing my interview and transferring the condemning footage in preparation for a special broadcast, that NASA somehow found out about her program and threatened NBC, and all of their affiliates, with permanently disconnecting their live camera aboard the International Space Station and never cooperating with them ever again as retaliation if they broadcasted this revealing television program of theirs. Seeing how NBC and the Discovery Channel regularly used and boasted about video feeds from this camera of theirs onboard the International Space Station on numerous ongoing television programs on on numerous channels of theirs, NBC succumbed to the NASA blackmail, cancelled their television special showcasing this amazing discovery from the “Discovery Channel”, and never aired the interview they filmed of me painstakingly explaining the newly discovered condemning NASA footage, which they had already excitedly purchased the exclusive rights to, even though it cost them tens of thousands of dollars of loss in the process.
Do you still believe there is a free press outside of government control?
How the federal government found out about this special broadcast which the producer tried to keep confidential from them is a mystery to me, unless my work is being monitored. The question is, why would my “silly” work about the moon landing fraud be monitored by the government if they really went to the moon?
In an effort to find out, I went the NASA launch headquarters in Florida to see what would happen. When I encountered a retired “Apollo” astronaut and asked him to confirm that he actually left Earth orbit (because I had newly discovered evidence to the contrary), I was promptly, and forcibly, removed from the public property, which was opened to the public, by security forces, with the threat of arrest if I persisted with my questions. If you had been there and witnessed this firsthand as I did, you would have sworn that I was in oppressive North Korea or China, rather than the “free” United States of America, with an alleged “free” press.
The only television program to ever broadcast my newly discovered condemning footage of unedited outtakes of false photography from the first “moon mission”, with its most revealing secret audio channel of the CIA prompting the astronauts during their deception, was “Tech TV’s” enormously popular national cable talk show called “Unscrewed”, who mistakenly broadcast the revealing footage without prior executive approval. In fact, the show was so successful, that their viewership doubled every thirty days for the first two years it was on the air! Despite being the highest rated program on the entire network by far, bringing in the owners of the channel untold millions of dollars, the show was abruptly canceled immediately after airing this inflammatory footage of NASA’s forgery, especially when someone powerful higher up witnessed the studio audience reacting with horror and indignation when they saw it. This cancellation was a not so subtle warning to other broadcasters who might make the same error in judgment. Since then, knowing this penalty of termination hanging over their heads, no other network has dared to air, on any of their programs, any condemning portions of this monumental evidence, which emphatically proves, to both an NBC news director and producer, as well as many other professionals, that the “moon missions” never left Earth orbit, as is their limit today, with fifty years better rockets and computers.
The simple Truth is, if I really walked on the moon, and someone thought otherwise, I would find that hysterically funny! If someone asked me to swear on the Bible to that “fact”, why in the world would I object to taking an oath of such an “obvious” event? Instead, the astronauts in question reacted to the request as if I walked up to them in the company of their wife and asked them how their secret mistress was doing! If they really walked on the moon, me saying otherwise would be like throwing a feather at them. Why would anyone be violently mad at someone for throwing a feather at them? If, on the other hand, I were exposing a real crime of infidelity that they had gotten away with for decades and built lifelong financial reputations on, then you could certainly see why they would react with such violent hatred.
I even met privately with “investigative journalist” Geraldo Rivera in New York City to personally give him a copy of “A Funny Thing happened on the Way to the Moon”, which includes the newly discovered condemning video evidence. While I later appeared as a guest on his show to discuss this topic, he made it clear to me that though he may be personally suspicious of the “moon missions” authenticity, he is not able to say so publicly and keep his job. The only way that I could appear and present my case on his program was if I did not show the number one key piece of evidence of the fraud. Why would this matter . . . if they really went to the moon? Instead of showcasing the recently uncovered absolute proof of the fraud, Fox television chose to sensationalize the violence I received in pursuit of the Truth. Subsequently, one has to question Geraldo’s (and other’s) credentials as a real “investigative journalists”, rather than pop-culture propagandists, especially when they privately confide in me that they know the hidden Truth and refuse to share it with the public, whom they claim to look out for, out of fear of personal reprisal.
The same is true of the “New York Times”. While “investigate reporter” John Schwartz interviewed me in-depth on the topic of the moon landing fraud, the story which he actually wrote was about “how interesting it is that some people doubt the moon landings”, rather than an actual investigation into the real possibility that indeed the missions were a Cold War deception. When I asked him about the newly discovered condemning video evidence of the astronauts staging their photography of being “halfway to the moon” when they were still in earth orbit, he replied, “I can’t explain that”, and then he went on to say that such an investigation of his along these lines would result in his termination by his superiors.
“USA Today”, along with many other newspapers, television and radio stations, “reviewed” my documentary “A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon”, yet repeatedly toted the status quo. In each and every case, with the exception of John Schwartz who was admittedly dumbfounded by the newly discovered condemning video evidence, when I tracked down the actual person who wrote the critical review of my film and asked them, “What did you think about the newly discovered unedited footage of false photography from Apollo 11 showcased in my movie?”, they all replied, “Well . . . I didn’t actually watch the movie. I wrote the review on the concept of the film, not the actual content.”
The fact is, four out of five people who actually watch the forty-seven minute documentary, with the condemning new evidence debuted in it, reverse their opinion as to the “moon missions” authenticity.
90% of allegedly professional “journalists”, for major magazines, newspapers, and television stations, actually wrote reviews about a film which they didn’t even watch! . . . Can you believe this?! Why aren’t people like this fired for incompetence or dereliction of duty, instead of being promoted to positions of national media authority?!
Four networks, so far, have paid thousands of dollars for the exclusive license to broadcast this newly discovered amazing NASA footage, only to be told at the eleventh hour not to do it by senior network executives (who are likely bedfellows of the CIA, by bribe or by blackmail, whose criminality would be exposed by airing it). The BBC did this very thing only three days before my film’s scheduled broadcast, after they had licensed the condemning footage nearly a year in advance at the cost of thousands of dollars. I was privately informed that a senior US government official personally telephoned the president of the BBC and put pressure on them to not air the program with its condemning new evidence. The BBC even bribed the executive producer of my film with additional thousands of dollars to sign a contract not to publicize their reason for recanting. Again, why would all this be going on, if they really went to the moon fifty years ago on the first attempt?
In fact, this executive producer of which I speak, who wishes to remain anonymous, who put up approximately one million dollars to help produce these films of mine exposing the moon landing fraud, has an IQ nearing 200 and is a board member of an aerospace company which is presently building rockets for NASA! Wouldn’t such a person know whether the “moon landing” of 1969 was possible or not with 1960’s technology? Of course they would. They do know. They know that the missions were staged. They know, from an engineering standpoint, that 1960’s NASA “low bid” equipment, which killed three astronauts on the ground two years earlier without even igniting an engine, could never have successfully landed on the moon on their first attempt with 1960’s technology, especially considering the fact that the feat cannot be repeated today with fifty years more advanced computers and rockets, with astronauts now only being able to travel 1/1000th as far from the Earth as was claimed a half a century ago!
Although the technology allegedly used to “put a man on the moon” was not classified, because the missions were “supposed” to have been done by a non-military “civilian” government agency (NASA), all of the specific blueprints of the hypothetically miraculous machinery, according to NASA, are nevertheless “unavailable”. This is because all of the flight telemetry data, as well as all of the technical specifications of the “Apollo” spacecraft, were deliberately destroyed by NASA after the “moon missions”. You would think that such important, one of a kind, and supremely valuable and expensive designs, at a cost of One Hundred Fifty Billion Dollars in today’s value, would be kept for just short of all of eternity, in case such costly to attain information and equipment would be needed again in the future . . . Yet the exact opposite is the case.
How did the lunar lander power air-conditioning against an outside temperature of 252 degrees Fahrenheit (122 C) down to an amazing 72 degrees Fahrenheit (22 C) inside a boiling spacecraft for three days nonstop with a bank of, essentially, car batteries? No one will ever know. All of the schematics and electrical diagrams of the lunar lander were deliberately destroyed! How did the “moon” rocket go 1000 times farther than the space shuttle with decades less advanced technology? No one will ever know. The rocket diagrams and blueprints were removed from the national archives and are nowhere to be found!
Imagine Bill Gates spending One Hundred Fifty Billion Dollars to build the first computer, and then once successfully completing it, throwing the computer with its blueprints into a furnace . . . Would anyone ever – ever – ever do such a crazy thing?! . . . Of course not . . . yet . . . this is what NASA did with the “technology” which they claimed could reach the moon in the 1960’s.
This is proof itself that the “moon missions” were fraudulent . . . Here’s why . . .
If you really went to the moon and spent One Hundred Fifty Billion Dollars to do so, you would never – ever – ever deliberately throw away such precious hard earned technology . . . Never! Has anyone ever deliberately thrown away breakthrough technology in the entire history of the world? . . . Of course not. Even the atomic bomb, though this technology should have been thrown away, was cherished with relish, protected with all security, and then multiplied and improved upon one hundredfold within just ten years. Thusly, if the moon landings were real fifty years ago, then men would have walked on Mars decades ago.
On the other hand, if NASA faked going to the moon, and a detailed analysis of the engineering specifications could prove mathematically that the rocket did not have enough fuel to reach its destination and return, or that the onboard computers were not fast enough to process the complicated trajectories in real time as the mission required, or that the power in the lunar module batteries was not sufficient to supply the air conditioning to combat exterior temperatures of 252 degrees Fahrenheit (122 Celsius) for three days without cooking alive the crew inside, then yes indeed NASA would definitely destroy any and all proof of their deception, which is exactly what they did.
Again, if NASA really went to the moon, they would never – ever – ever destroy that important technology. If, on the other hand, NASA faked going to the moon, then they would most definitely destroy the evidence which would prove it a technological impossibility. Thusly, the fact that NASA did destroy the evidence is concrete proof itself that they did not go to the moon. End of story.
All of this intentional file burning was done so that if a curious and astute propulsion or electrical engineering student in the future were to do the actual mathematical calculations, they would not be able to expose the fact that the “lunar lander”, in reality, did not have the electrical battery capacity necessary to power the air-conditioning down 180 degrees Fahrenheit (82 C) from the outside temperature nonstop for three days, nor did the onboard rudimentary computers have the processing power or speed to calculate the complicated trajectories in real time to avoid a fatal catastrophe, nor did the main “Apollo” rocket have the fuel necessary to leave Earth orbit to begin with, as the newly uncovered video evidence clearly proves by the crew’s falsification of being halfway to the moon.
Wernher von Braun, the astute mathematician and rocket scientist, said this regarding the only way to reach the moon:
“It is commonly believed that men will fly directly from the Earth to the moon, but to do this we would require a vehicle of such gigantic proportions that it would prove an economic impossibility. Calculations have been carefully worked out on the type of vehicle we would need for the nonstop flight from the Earth to the moon and to return. The figures speak for themselves: Three rockets would be necessary, each rocket ship would be taller than the Empire State Building (1250 feet) and weigh about ten times the tonnage of the Queen Mary (800,000 tons).”
The “moon” rocket the United States Government could afford weighed just 2500 tons (a difference of 32,000 percent) and was just 363 feet tall . . . and there was just one of them, rather than the three stated as required. Furthermore, Braun went on to say that a Space Station must first be constructed before a manned mission to the moon, from which to ferry the three rockets and the necessary fuel to the moon and back. (The International Space Station was not completed until 2011.) Braun further insisted that after once landing on the moon, crews would have to find or dig a cave in which to shelter themselves from thousands of micrometeorites per hour hitting the moon’s surface traveling at speeds in excess of 20,000 miles per hour, which would inevitably puncture the spacecraft, as well as the astronaut’s spacesuit, causing catastrophic, and fatal, environmental decompression. This, of course, like the other requirements, was never done.
When the government told the man in charge of the “moon” rocket to adjust his numbers “a little bit” to reflect a fictitious way to reach the moon with the available resources and technology of the time, he immediately, and obediently, dramatically recanted his published and respected findings. Did I mention that this man in charge of the “moon” program’s authenticity, Wernher von Braun, was a former World War Two Nazi whom our own government’s State Department is on the record for saying that, had he not prematurely died shortly after the “moon missions”, he would have been immediately thereafter indicted for War Crimes for overseeing the genocide, and the cover-up thereof, of hundreds of innocent people during the war? This threat of blackmail, and likely bribery as well, was likely used to gain his obedient submission to the government deception and his “adjustment” of irrefutable mathematical calculations. (“The figures speak for themselves.”)
Not only are all of the specifications, blueprints, and telemetry data of the miraculous NASA 1960’s technology that allegedly went to the moon on the very first attempt nowhere to be found because it was all intentionally destroyed, all of the original television transmission videotapes, estimated to weigh about two tons, have also been mysteriously “lost” inside the Federally Secured National Archives. Why? Because naïve director Ron Howard, whose own wise grandfather warned him that the “moon missions” were staged, ignoring that advice, requested that all of the original videotapes be transferred to High Definition for an I-Max documentary he was producing to gleefully commemorate the “moon missions”, as he believed, at that time, that they were real. Prior to Howard’s request, the highest quality version of the television footage that anyone had ever seen was deliberately a fourth generation copy (a copy, of a copy, of a copy), in order to diminish and disguise the falsification detail and resolution of the fake “moon” landscapes, so that any imperfections that might give away the illusion would be minimized.
When this moon-landing-believing prominent film director asked for the original NASA videotapes of all of the “moon walks” so that he could transfer them to High Definition video, in order to be projected for the first time in history onto a screen that was nearly 120 feet by 100 feet, for all the world to see at a resolution that was at least four times greater in detail than had ever before been witnessed, within days of his request, all of the original “moon landing” videotapes vanished from the Federal Archives! But of course, we still went to the moon, right?
Proof of this bewildering predicament, is that when Howard’s documentary commemorating the “moon missions” was finally produced without this essential material, he resorted to filling about 95 percent of his landmark film with “reenactments” of the supposed moon walks, which he likewise filmed in a television studio. In fact, there was so little actual original footage available of the alleged greatest event of mankind, that this multimillion dollar director had to resort to renting VHS tapes of other filmmaker’s previous work on the subject at Blockbuster Video in order to have at least some of the vanishing NASA footage! He was so ashamed of the low quality of the VHS images that he was forced to use, because of the scarcity of them, that he reduced their size within the nearly 120 foot by 100 foot screen to only about 10 percent of the available space to minimize the now fifth generation copy quality.
In case you were wondering “what if”, someday, the mysteriously vanished original videotapes were to one day be found? . . . Oops! . . . Did I forget to tell you? . . . The only machine on the entire planet that could ever play these one of a kind format videotapes was deliberately disassembled and destroyed by NASA, right after the original tapes got “misplaced”, making that scenario absolutely impossible. Funny, isn’t it? The National Archives has the original “Declaration of Independence”, more than two hundred forty years old, yet “misplaced” every original document about the “greatest achievement of all mankind” (amounting to several tons in weight), which is only fifty years old!
As various nations and private enterprises finally, after nearly fifty years, have the capability to send microwave oven sized probes to the moon (still no men), NASA has quickly drafted regulations to keep their alleged manned landing sites of the Nixon administration completely off-limits. They have said that any flyovers of these locations, or ground incursions thereof, by probes of any nations, including their own, to prove or disprove the “moon missions” authenticity, are strictly forbidden. (Since when does the US government own the moon?) You would think that they would gladly welcome independent proof (of which there has never been) that their outrageous scientific claims of 1960’s technology were real (even though the feat cannot be repeated today, half a century later), especially in the face of growing universal doubt to the contrary, yet again the exact opposite proves to be the case. It is like a murderer who boasts about their innocence, all the while refusing to give a personal DNA sample, which they know full well might incriminate them.
China, a trillion dollar trading partner of the United States, recently sent an un-manned probe to the moon. As all of the moon is uniformly desolate and one landing site is just about as good as any other for exploration, I would think that the perfect and most logical place to land would be that of the United States’ alleged first “moon mission”, to prove to the world that their probe was really on the moon. Yet if the American government’s “moon landing” artifacts are not there themselves, this might be biting the trillion dollar trading-partner hand that feeds them. Subsequently, China steered clear of any supposed NASA “moon landing” sites for any of their unmanned lunar probes, even though these were the most logical places to land.
Astrobotic Technology, a private firm, had also planned to land an unmanned probe precisely at the claimed “Apollo 11” landing site, as they too saw this as the most logical choice to prove that their probe was really on the moon, yet because of pressure from NASA not to do so, and subsequently embarrass the organization and government for not having really landed on the moon in 1969, the president of the company, John Thornton, caved in and agreed not to land there as originally planned, even though the moon is not owned by anyone and he was “free” to do so. Is it scientific “freedom” when important exploration is completely abandoned because of pressure to maintain a falsehood of the CIA?
If putting a man on the moon is supposed to be “the greatest achievement of mankind”, then certainly not doing it as internationally claimed, lying about it to the entire world, embezzling One Hundred Fifty Billion Dollars in the process, deceiving and misleading college students, high school students, scientists, academics, congress, the senate, and future space pioneers who will endanger their lives thinking it was so easy to go to the moon in the 1960’s on the very first attempt, then this event, the falsification of the moon landings, out of pride, greed, and arrogance, is really one of the most profound events in human history. This is why the falsification of the moon landings is more profound historically, than if they had actually gone.
Do you see this?
This Great Truth, as to the True nature of humanity and their governments, the deceptive, arrogant, and criminal nature thereof, is being withheld from the majority, by the few people at the top, because they are the ones who committed this crime in the first place and think that they are better than the rest of us.
This Great Truth, which would humble mankind and their governments into changing their character for the better, before it is too late, is being withheld from the public, like a cure for cancer, the very disclosure of which would bring about its recovery, and without this disclosure, our intellectual and moral growth will be forever stunted.
I am sometimes criticized by my fellow citizens as “unpatriotic” for saying that the “glorious” American “moon landings” were a Cold War CIA deception, even though this is the Truth. Our country has hopelessly descended into a realm where liars are heroes, and Truth speakers are villains. If George Washington arose from his grave today and saw all of this unspeakable corruptive government deception, he would grab the first ship back to England. He repeatedly told the painstakingly detailed unflattering Truth of the desperateness of the situation of his Continental Army against the vastly outnumbered and better equipped British troops, to a congress, whom even at that early historic hour, wanted to hear flowery lies of success instead of unpleasant realities. Our leaders have gone from “I can never tell a lie”, to practically lying all of the time. It is not un–patriotic to expose corruption, it is patriotic. It is un-patriotic to have committed this deceitfulness in the first place. If you love Truth and America, then you can see why, “The Truth will set you free.”
Just as a gangster’s children would have a hard time seeing dear old papa as anything but a benevolent patriarch, prideful “intellectuals”, as well as deceived “patriots” will seldom admit, without being forcibly shown, that their idolized “science” and aggrandized “government” can be just as corrupt as pedophile priest.
The fact remains, that if all of the scientists from all of the nations on earth cannot go to the moon today with fifty years more advanced computer and rocket technology, and astronauts now can only travel 1/1000th the distance from earth as was claimed half a century ago, on the very first attempt, with one millionth the computing power in all of NASA than a modern day cell phone, then it simply means, and it cannot mean anything else, that America did not go to the moon in the 1960’s.
Technology does not go backwards . . .
Except in this one case,
and no other instance,
in the entire history of the world.
All of these facts eventually become obvious to anyone with an open mind who does not have a religious attachment to the blasphemous event.
Bart Sibrel is an award winning filmmaker, writer and investigative journalist who has been producing movies and television programs for thirty years.